Many people claimed that there are some people are born with a special power, for example, some of them are good at music or sport, while others have not certain talents. Alternatively, it is sometimes said that everyone can learn everything if there be a good specialist for teaching. Let us examine both views before reaching a concrete decision.
Though it is true that, some musicians and sportsmen are born with individual capability. In other words, thanks for their genes, what they are given by parents or roots. As an effect, they can be successful in the sport or music area. For example, statistics show that more than 60 % of people who are talented in those areas their children also continue from their trace. To sum up, it is not simple to hide about your power, so one day it would be appearance.
On the other hand, if it is taught effectively every person can be a great musician or sportsman. There is o doubt that knowledge can be effective every side. Research has found that the most well-known people in those sides were found by a great coach. For instance, Ronaldo, a famous football player was discovered by his father's friend. He trained Ronaldo on how to play football. To repeat in a short way, knowledge can be taught, while student wants to do it willingly.
To conclude, as far as I am concerned, it is not fair to ignore genes but to meet a superb trainer in life is given a chance to a person from God. Moreover, one good teacher means more excellent trainers n the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a short way" with adverb for "short"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...aldo on how to play football. To repeat in a short way, knowledge can be taught, while student...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in other words, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54042894491 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.91555246 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.625 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357178787645 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093841116893 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867492368101 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192691370412 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133255635415 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.