The maps depict the modernization that taken place in an area adjacent to the beach in Australia in two distinctive time frames: 1950 and now.
Overall, the place has witnessed significant changes, the most prominent of which is the expansion of the road and the construction and refurbishment of some facilities near the beach. Nevertheless, the dining tables installed near the road and the aligned pavilion are those that stayed unchanged throughout the time period.
As per the maps, it is noticeable that the playground near the aforementioned dining area has been removed to make way for a new car. Another major change worth mentioning is the southward-bending road, which creates a direct route to the permanent lighthouse near the sea.
In addition, the beachfront area has been refurbished with a new restaurant and a smaller surf club in opposition to it. Moreover, there has been an enlargement of the pool near the dining property, which doubled the initial 25m measurement. To the side that is near the lighthouse, the 25m pool saw no salient changes whereas a new surf club has been erected next to the mentioned swimming facility.
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 73
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at least 150 words 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09473684211 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03307711519 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.6277864264 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.072226838481 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033934433227 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478918130568 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524078169288 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502805771478 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.