The two maps show how Islip town will be renovated, as well as its current situation.
Overall, the neighborhood is expected to undergo noticeable improvements to become a more convenient living environment with a variety of features.
In terms of the present, a major road that runs from the west to the east encircles Islip. Along with having access to the neighboring rural region, residents can find shops on both sides of the top main road. The park and school are located east and west of the main road, respectively, and are constructed around a sizable housing development.
The estimate shows that the region is expected to grow toward the north, which was formerly rural, in order to house additional amenities including a bus station, a shopping complex, and a parking lot. It is anticipated that the center section of the ancient major road will only be utilized by walkers. Furthermore, the park is expected to be regulated and new houses will be built to the left. A dual road is also expected to circle the city, and it would pass by the new homes on the right side of the parking lot.
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76165803109 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69267587526 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611398963731 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.701905167 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701388032466 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318927960238 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514784102792 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575366758137 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683424419436 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.