The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two maps depicting the planned renovations of Islip town.
Perceptibly, the area is predicted to be upgraded significantly to become a more convenient living place with various features.
Regarding the current time, Islip is surrounded by a main road, which spans from the west to the east. Residents can find shops on two sides of the top main road, moreover, they can access the countryside area nearby the northern stores. The main road led to a park in the east and a school in the southwest, which are built around a large site devoted to housing.
It is noticeable from the calculation that the area, to home more amenities such as a bus station, a shopping center and a car park, is planned to extend toward the north, which was countryside previously. The middle part of the old main road is expected to be used for pedestrians only, which would help people access shops in the heart of the area. Albeit not projecting to witness renovations in the southern area, the park is predicted to be moderated, while housing would be newly-erected to the left. Additionally, a dual carriageway is estimated to stretch around the city; a part of it would lead to new housing on the right side of the car park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting the planned reno...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67592592593 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75316254116 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.727866208 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785744258434 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413336967569 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053504811884 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671939777872 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681563411787 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.