Given are the two maps delineating the transformations of the seafront area of the town called Darwin in a certain timeline, commencing from 2009 to 2014.
It is perceptible that there were drastic modifications with the development and replacement of the architecture without the multiple elimination of the original ones in over the years given.
In the south of the region, the most prominent of modifications was the disappearance of the major part of the town covered by the industrial area to make way for the presence of trees. Furthermore, the year 2014 brought the construction of three residential buildings newly- built opposite of the old ones in the center along with the appearance of the university block in the west. Another additional development was the harbour erected along the seashore which could be accessed by the new footpath from the west.
Meanwhile, in the north of the map, the footpath that covered the old smaller industrial area that was changed into the swimming pool and the lake was unchanged. Likewise, there was no difference with the locations of the school, the convention center, two former swimming pools on the seashore and the fishing area in the northeast.
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 73
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the transforma...
^^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...nation of the original ones in over the years given. In the south of the region, the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by the industrial area to make way for the presence of trees. Furthermore, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08080808081 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98099616383 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.4057020822 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 143.714285714 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151259022159 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716919458447 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916233882763 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10390534576 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107125121419 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.