The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014

The given maps illustrate the layout of the waterfront area of Darwin town after changing over a period of 5 years from 2009.
Overall, the waterfront region experienced the modernization with the appearance of numerous infrastructure and amenities between 2009 and 2014.
There were many changes that have taken place at the examined area. Firstly, the industrial area, which was surrounded by a ring footpath at the center of the map, was replaced to make room for new swimming pool to meet the demand of inhabitants. Meanwhile, a massive other industrial area located at the south of the picture was divided into 2 distinct parts, one for planting green trees with larger size, and the other for constructing a new university and more buildings for housing.
Secondly, a newly-built harbor appearing on the right-hand side of the map contributed to modernize this area. On the contrary, the remaining facilities including lake, convention center, school and place for fishing remained intact in terms of location and size.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earing on the right-hand side of the map contributed to modernize this area. On t...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the contrary, the remaining facilities including lake, convention center, schoo...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21084337349 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88808148449 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680722891566 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4518359934 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310946525776 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147457265225 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115715955035 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174903975954 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787292877041 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.