The maps below show the city of Stokeford in 1930 and development plans for 2030.
The maps below illustrate the town of Stokeford as it was in 1930 and also the plans for its future development by 2030.
Overall, the town used to be a rural area whereas the future plans are meant to convert it into a suburban hub. There used to be lots of farmland and a few shops but they are mostly to be replaced with new houses in the future.
Some features are supposed to remain the same. This includes the River Stoke and the bridge over it in the north of the town. There is also a main road that intersects through the town, effectively dividing it into eastern and western part.
As for the new developments, there are many. East of the road, there used to be a few homes, a shop and a post office in 1930 which is going to be replaced by rows of new houses as well as two new streets will be added. In the south, on the east side of the road, there used to farmlands which will all be paved to make space for some more new houses.
Similarly, on the west side of the main road, the farmland will be demolished to make room for a row of new houses. Although the school will stay in its place, there will be some additions to the structure. This side will also see development of a retirement home which will replace the large house with a garden.
- Nowadays people have greater access to fast food Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The maps below show the city of Stokeford in 1930 and development plans for 2030 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from on university did after finishing 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures To what extent do you agree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22131147541 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22751839847 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479508196721 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2960963117 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143678244869 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669809141481 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138894161336 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129164764586 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196010396218 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.2 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22131147541 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22751839847 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479508196721 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2960963117 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143678244869 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669809141481 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138894161336 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129164764586 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196010396218 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.2 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.