The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps compare the map of an industrial area of Norbiton currently and its future planned development. Overall, the site will be converted from an industrial property into a housing property.
The industrial area is in the east outside of town. A roundabout in the center of the site interconnects three factories while the other five connect via road on the far east side, and the river up north is untouched.
The plan is to remove the factories and expand the road system by having one roundabout in the center of the industrial land and adding a smaller one between the medical center and shops. A road will be expanded in the northwest area for three housing areas and another three housing properties in the east. The other housing areas will also be built around a playground and schools. Lastly, another road will expand up north, extending over the river for additional housing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-15 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-16 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 67
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, lastly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8431372549 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60983264815 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7521929262 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.625 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170283381315 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094055040465 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975216699908 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144024856524 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985671023836 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.