Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is constantly debated whether trainees of different proffessions should be allowed to work outside their country of study. While concerns of various aspects exist, I personally contend that the choice of which country to work in is totally up to the students’ free will and that no barriers should exist.
On the one hand, skeptics of allowing professional students to work in any country hold the opinion that it would be a waste of time and money spent on cultivating the trainees to the professional level if they don’t stay and repay their school and country of study. This is definitely one essential factor that is creating doubts. It would also mean a loss of talent if they can’t retain them. Another concern is that confidential skills or data may be leaked to other countries. If one country excels in a particular field, for example, bone repair, when other countries’ students master the skills, the competitive edge of this country would be awakened.
On the other hand, despite the drawbacks mentioned, there are plentiful ways to overcome them and many advantage of allowing students to work where they want exist. First of all, the trainees, such as medical students have already paid a large sum of tuition fees for their studies. So the institutions and the countries have already benefitted from teaching them. Therefore, it would not be fair if restriction on work were still placed. Besides, we are now in a more globalized world and economy. With the skills and expertise learnt from the developed countries, students would work to help developing areas. For example many students from the third world are admitted to Chinese universities every year in hope of receiving better education to construct their home countries. If few countries remain dominant in professional areas, the world would continue to be hugely imbalanced. Finally, finding ideal jobs is dependent on the students’ abilities. Encouraging them to find work not confined to where they were trained would also be advantageous for improving employment rates.
In conclusion, limiting the work of professional students to where they were taught should not be taken. Instead, we should encourage them to work in other countries.
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 56
- my interpretation of civilization
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advantage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advantages'.
Suggestion: many advantages
...are plentiful ways to overcome them and many advantage of allowing students to work where they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
... countries, students would work to help developing areas. For example many students from t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15659340659 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78532276114 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6465812394 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7894736842 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335451044164 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10519203533 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081390063742 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240133343195 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469977803107 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.