The maps below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now

The map depicts the modernization which has taken place in the Riverage College over the 30-year time period.

Overall, there have been significant changes to this education property. The most prominent is the rearrangement and development of the building complex, which aligns itself with the terrace and the newly planted tree. However, it is noticeable that the library and the reception block stayed unchanged throughout the time period.

As per the map, the refectory and the common room were demolished to make room for a new office and café, respectively. Notably, a new art-class room has been constructed to replace the initial four office blocks. In addition, a music room has been built adjacent to the reception.

Besides the refurbishment within the blocks, there have also been some minor replacements on the outside of those aforementioned buildings. The flower area to the east of the sport hall has been removed and the steps have been added. Moreover, a tree has been planted in replacement of the car parking lot which used to face the reception room and the four offices.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he reception room and the four offices.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80222574676 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3771550809 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806637725515 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345021348371 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07505390708 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750592151808 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103009157386 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.