The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The above picture explains the changes in the map of Pancha Village in the years 2005 and 2015.
That decade really brought a lot of development in the village. Visible features include metallic road, tele-communication networks and cables including improved school provinces.
The places of Pagoda and houses of residents doesn't show any major changes, where as market place became well organised with many shop than earlier. The installments of communication network towers beside the market place is a major change. Cables are also being arranged across the road on one side facilitating distribution of wires all around the village. The road was so developed from stoned to metallic with traffic signals installed on other side. Unlike the previous times when village only had primary school, now village consists of both primary and secondary schools with separate buildings constructed for each. The overall changes are noticeable and included technology enhancement in their lives too.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...laces of Pagoda and houses of residents doesnt show any major changes, where as market...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...esidents doesnt show any major changes, where as market place became well organised with...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun shop seems to be countable; consider using: 'many shops'.
Suggestion: many shops
...market place became well organised with many shop than earlier. The installments of commu...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, really, second, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46103896104 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78195793118 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.733766233766 0.547539520022 134% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3587602018 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108086555775 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420806404426 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738706297956 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106013808468 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965127428516 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.