The given graph plots about two different languages, French and Mandarin, that are selected by 13-year old students in a school of England in the period 2000 to 2010.
In the early period of the decade, French was so popular among these age group with nearly 150 students learning it in the year 2000. This line graph followed a downward trend having 140 students in 2001 and decreased to 100 students by 2004. It decreased till 2005 which had nearly 90 students, and had slight increase to 100 in 2006 and was nearly constant after that settling at 90 students nearly by the end of decade.
Coming to the Mandarin language, it was not a very suggested language and had less than 10 students in the start but amazingly had a huge increase through out the graph, with students of more than 70 in the year 2005, where French had lowest in the total trend. Mandarin has 20 students in 2001 and had gradual increase till 2005 and had a slight decrease making it about 60 in 2006 and followed a constant rate after that, making it more than 70 at present. But didn't make 80 till date.
- The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say that physical education classes are an important part of a child s education Others believe that it is more important to focus on academics during school time Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- Around the world children learn English as a second language at school However in some places they also learn at kindergarten pre school care when children are aged two to five Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of learning English at kindergarden 78
- The process shows how plants create food 78
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...start but amazingly had a huge increase through out the graph, with students of more than 7...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... making it more than 70 at present. But didnt make 80 till date.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50505050505 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23932810189 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0420038338 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182708279809 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929178028471 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850078633399 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157042127751 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847248330714 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.