The maps provide complete information about how the town named langle changed from the year 1910 to 1950
Overall, it can be manifest from the maps that town has been changed, mostly from all the parts, but the majority of the changes were in north and south area of the town.
To begin with, in 1910, there were cottages of railway workers in the south direction of the langle town, which were demolished and at that place children play area was been built in 1950. Secondly, in the center of the park there were many houses in 1910, while in 1950 all of these houses were demolished and a new park name sherman park was created their. Thirdly, in 1910, there was a factory in the north direction of a town and a shop in the central part of the langle town, both of these were removed and at that place, a new big Sherman mansion was built in 1950.
Additionally, in 1910, there were many houses in the straight line starting from northeast and line ends in the southeast, all of them were demolished and at that place, three big buildings were constructed in 1950. Lastly, there was a cafe and laundry in the central west direction of the town in 1910, while in 1950 both of them were shifted to the north-west corner of the town, and three new stores were built in the south-west corner of the town.
- The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950 67
- The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950 67
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050 67
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 86
- In many countries women are allowed to take maternity leave from their jobs during the first months after the birth of their baby Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...ed and at that place children play area was been built in 1950. Secondly, in the center ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44398340249 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2085761426 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414937759336 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.6766812458 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.5 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.1666666667 22.9334400587 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241270968389 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144180704692 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594095822231 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180654778936 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478741334936 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.36 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.