The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The visual given illustrates the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. It can be seen that the village has gone under the process of modernisation and most of the farmland was removed and replaced with the housing objects.
At the top right-hand corner, below the bridge place, the road was expanded to the both, left and right, sides and houses around it were developed. The shops at the left of primary school were removed, and the school was extended with two large houses. Furthermore, the central area, below the post office, was extended with houses. Nearby gardens, to the right of this area, were reduced and number of the large houses were expanded. Among these houses, one of them were reconstructed into retirement home.
Finally, at the bottom hand corner, houses were developed around the both sides of the road.
To sum up, the village of Stokeford had undergone the major changes and a lot of green surfaces, such as farmland and gardens, were removed and reduced. Thus, the number of the small and large houses had increased significantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | benj212 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | gulbakhyt_90 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the adva 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 78
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes. Why do you think this is the case? Is this a good thing or a bad thing? 61
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90607734807 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47903205933 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4644243551 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741794150893 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395853223185 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678464907177 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05328563421 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534301871382 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.