The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The table shows the percentage of money that consumers spend on various items, like food, clothes and education, in five European countries during the year 2002.
Overall, the table illustrates that the most percentage of money spent in each country was on food, drinks and tobacco, while least expenditure was on education and leisure. However, among nations, Turkey came on top of food expenditure as well as leisure, while Italian seemed to spend more on clothes and footwear.
Firstly, food, drinks and tobacco spending was highest in Turkey at 32.14 percent, as mentioned above. Closely behind was Ireland at 32.14 percent, while lowest spending was found to be in Sweden, only 15.77 percent.
Secondly, clothing and footwear expenditure was dominated by Italy at 9 percent, second highest was Turkey at 6.63 percent and this was followed by 6.43 percent spending of Ireland. Once again, the Sweden came last, as it only spent 5 .40 percent on clothes.
Thirdly, leisure and education was topped again by Turkey at 4.35 percent, which was followed by Sweden and Italy at 3.22 and 3.20 percent respectively. The least amount of spending was recorded in Spain, as it spent merely 1.98 percent of their total expenditure on this.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 78
- The charts below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The bar chart below shows top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...ountry was on food, drinks and tobacco, while least expenditure was on education and leisur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the lowest'.
Suggestion: while the lowest
...ly behind was Ireland at 32.14 percent, while lowest spending was found to be in Sweden, onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, third, thirdly, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12315270936 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50664868527 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1364556246 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0617665596093 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361546506225 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468263840929 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531211546125 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562617747464 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.