The chart shows two places, a village named Meadowside and its neighbouring town called Fonton, which have changed in three different years in the three separate years.
Overall, Meadowside was extending continuously, connecting to Fonton, and becoming a suburb, finally. Meanwhile, infrastructures were developed more and more comprehensively in Meadowside according to these maps.
As the period for 1962 to 1985, not only Fonton, but also Meadowside have extended almost 3 times more than previous. At the same time, two railways were set, one through Meadowside from up to down, and another connected to two villages. There were lots of convenient buildings for local inhabitants, such as housing estate, superstore and leisure complex.
Concerning nowadays, Meadowside and Fonton are linking each other together. A business park was built in the middle of two villages, and a station was near the park. Therefore, Fonton's registers can access it by bus. The hotel is at the back of the station.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The maps illustrate how Meadowside village and Fonton which is a neighboring town have developed over three different time periods 1962 1985 and the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 84
- People should look after their health as a duty to the society where they live rather than their own benefits What extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38607594937 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97010825088 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70253164557 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.395056152 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205351992221 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713884172844 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768579832508 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121773188684 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064643151952 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.