The given maps demonstrate some major changes to a small town called Islip. Overall, the town center will develop into a more modernized and residential location as the countryside size will be reduced dramatically.
According to the map, the town center now is really simple as there is only a straight main road running in between 2 rows of shops, with a branch on the left which leads to the school. In the southeast of the town center, there is a large park with a branch leading back to the main road, as well as 2 housing areas lying between the school and the park.
However, the newly developed town center would look completely different. Starting with a new dual carriageway circling around all the major features of the town center, which will take up the space of the countryside in the north. Inside the circle, the southern row of shops will be kept facing a new passageway for pedestrians. Beyond the passageway to the north, a new bus station, a shopping center, as well as a car park would be built in the given order, beside a new housing area. Across the shops to the south, the park will still be kept but cut in size, standing next to 2 housing areas, one of which is newly constructed. Outside of the town center, the school, and the housing area will remain the same in their places.
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organizations from 2008 to 2011 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 73
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, really, so, still, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54008438819 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47284023853 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2106006234 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20621248732 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093981234021 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078549561655 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154850318418 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056686236052 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.