The maps show changes in a city in 1950 and now.
The given illustration of the maps compares the layout of a city as it was in 1950 and its current plan.
Overall, it is evident that this area undergoes some major developments. Noticeably, the most prominent change is the expansion of residential area. In addition, the river and the airport remain unchanged.
Apparently, the population of the city now is ten times higher than that in 1950, which is also directly proportional to the size of housing area after 70 years. Besides, the business district has been enlarged to the south of the city. There has been a construction of a lake along the river at present.
A bridge has been built in the East of the river, which was opposite a new dam. The airport still exists, whereas its size has been increased nearly three-fold compared to 1950. To the South of the river, there has been a decrease in size of the government building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | nguyen.buituan | 73 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 80
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The maps show changes in a city in 1950 and now 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given illustration of the maps compa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s it was in 1950 and its current plan. Overall, it is evident that this area un...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver and the airport remain unchanged. Apparently, the population of the city n...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a lake along the river at present. A bridge has been built in the East of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, so, still, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71153846154 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70445215759 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9787419303 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175912728657 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547851118496 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079764101578 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108954916447 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785988273873 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.