It is irrefutable that the development of effective household appliances have guaranteed more spare time for women to both work and run a house with small children. In additional, this has been proven actually as a two-sided sword since it provides merits and setbacks depending on various circumstances. And I personally believe that merits outweigh demerits totally.
To begin with, household applainces like refrigerator, gas, electrical oven have curtailed the amount of time women spend on household chores. Having said that, we cannot unsee the fact that they have dangerously chipped in to making women of Indian sub-continent or elsewhere other than the west rusty at traditional cooking and food because they (appliances) don't offer such cooking . What's more, many poor families in Nepal have spent a great deal on them just to vanish stabel foods they are used to taking. Another pursuasive deterrence is that failures of household appliances cost upto untimely demise though once in a blue moon.
On the other hand, there are compelling boons of latter appliances. They evidently help women get involved in money-making activities as opposed to spending a great deal in house chores. When they can get laborious chores like doing the washing-up done in no time, they can look after their kids and socialise them well, not to mention keep themselves physically and mentally sound.
Another key thing to remember is that these appliances get things done cleanly and quickly and also serve us healthy foods. So what's better than keeping ourselves healthy, working to accumulate fortune and safeguarding the future? Likewise, we cannot ignore the fact that these appliances tend to make people and in particular women, independent over elderly duration, which is itself extremely furthersome. To give an illustration, researchers in the US claim that people are mentally sound despite old age provided that they have been and tend to be independent.
All in all, household appliances keep us mentally and socially fit, allow us to brainwash our kids and earn mint(money) too. So I opine that the advantages are more than the simple, ignorable setbacks.
- New household appliances have resulted in more free time for women and has enabled them to both work and run a home with dependent children.Do you think the disadvantages outweight the advantages? 84
- many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment.why is this happening and what measures can be tackle this problem. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ooking and food because they appliances dont offer such cooking . Whats more, many p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... they appliances dont offer such cooking . Whats more, many poor families in Nepal...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ey appliances dont offer such cooking . Whats more, many poor families in Nepal have ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nces get things done cleanly and quickly and also serve us healthy foods. So what...
^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ly and also serve us healthy foods. So whats better than keeping ourselves healthy, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, likewise, look, so, well, in addition, in particular, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 5.60731707317 660% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 346.0 196.424390244 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25722543353 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80071983467 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 106.607317073 206% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635838150289 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 283.868780488 200% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2644572899 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238882910423 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696775645518 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897526186806 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12475115563 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774730075924 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 40.7170731707 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.