One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities?
For the last few years, there has been an overwhelming increase in the number of private vehicles, which leads to traffic congestion. To eradicate this issue, it is thought that the tax on the individual transportation should be mushroomed raised. My following essay will clarify how effective the above-mentioned solution is as well as suggest other possible measures.
To commence with, at the first glance, the rise increase in tax on personal conveyance may be a good idea because it helps ease a handful of private vehicles. Nonetheless, it seems not to be high-yielding in the long run. In fact, this method often has adverse influence on the middle class and the poor who have very few means of transportation whereas personal vehicles especially cars are often owned by the upper class who are willing to spend a large of sum on tax to utilize their own conveyance.
Therefore, I suggest several alternatives to alleviate the congestion. Firstly, the government should invest more money to construct more new modern roads as well as reinforce the old and backward ones. Roads must be divided into different lanes for each type of vehicles and annually they need to be checked carefully to ensure the best quality for traffic participants. Finally, strict penalties and laws have to be enforced to punish transportation encroaching on the lanes and carrying overweight which can cause traffic congestion and insecurity.
To encapsulate, I do not think that increasing tax on private vehicles is ideal. Instead, other measures as what I have suggested should be looked into. Maybe, they are more effective than people expected.
- One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities? 84
- Professional sports people are often idolised by young children Some people think that they therefore have a responsibility to be good role models at all times for children Do you agree or disagree 91
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason for doing this? Is this a negative or positive development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
For the last few years, there has been a...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as suggest other possible measures. To commence with, at the first glance, t...
^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'few means'.
Suggestion: few means
...middle class and the poor who have very few means of transportation whereas personal vehi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tax to utilize their own conveyance. Therefore, I suggest several alternative...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16853932584 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97923537137 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 106.607317073 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3829005146 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195121329421 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623370612591 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429973376138 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111687241731 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262432346812 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.