the percentage of daily consumption of fruits and vegetable by UK people in three different years
The bar chart represents the percentage of daily consumption of fruits and vegetable by UK people in three different years such as 2002, 2006 and 2010. The comparison was based on different genders and children in different years.
Overall, 2006 was the only year when all categories of people considered to eat fruits and vegetables compared to 2002 and 2010. In addition, throughout these years, females were consuming more fruits and vegetables, which is followed by men and children.
The total consumption of fruits and vegetables by women and men fluctuated over the period. While 25% of females were taking daily in 2002, it drastically curbed to 32% within 4 years. However, which suddenly reduced to 26% by 2010. Similarly, only 22% of men were only vegan in 2002, but it rose to 26% by 2006 and again declined to 24% after four years.
With regards to children, they were only a small population who were less interested to include fruits and vegetables in their diet in their category. Though 18% of them consumed fruits and vegetables in 2006, which was at the maximum rate, only 16% of kids considered the diet in 2010 and 11% in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | neethujithin | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | neethujithin | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Whether the design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 55
- University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies. Do the advantages of studying abroad outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- Nowadays, the problem of animal extinction reaches great attention. That is why animal conservations have been created in order to save endangered animals. Nevertheless, animal conservations are not only the places for animals but also hunters. Many hunte 55
- In town and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considered eating'.
Suggestion: considered eating
...only year when all categories of people considered to eat fruits and vegetables compared to 2002 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87878787879 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60253461256 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5177564882 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330277682189 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13867088281 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18131781089 0.0843802449381 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234252075784 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198291726883 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.