Percentage of Food budget spent on restaurant meals, home cooking? Fast food vs. Sit down restaurant ?
The given four circular chart reveals the information about the budget of food spent on restaurant meals and home cooking, and the second liner chart shows the information about the fast food meals and sit down restaurant meals during the year 1970 to 2000. The data is calibrated in both percentum and number which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, in the first chart during the year 1970, the budget of food spent on restaurant meals was 10%. In addition to this, in the year 2000 the budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking had equal. Moreover, during the year:1980,1990 and 2000 the budget spent on restaurant meals was 15%,35% and 50% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that, the sitdown restaurant meals had been increased year by year. Moving further, during the year 1970 to 1980 the sitdown restaurant meals had more increased as compare to fast food meals. Futhermore, the fast food meals during the year 1990 to 2000 was rapidly increased upto 80 number of meals.
Overall, it is evident that the food budget spent on highest percentage on restaurant meals, and the fast food had highest number of meals as compare to sit down restaurant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | Manpreetgill | 56 | view |
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 67
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.Water use, selected countries - 2000? 73
- The table below gives information about favorite pastime in different countries in percentage 59
- The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 67
- The table below gives information about Favorite pastime in different cauntries in percentage. (/means data not avilable) 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The given four circular chart reveals the information about the budge...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
... on restaurant meals, and the fast food had highest number of meals as compare to sit down ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85365853659 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53336568647 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424390243902 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4525586351 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423365657257 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209696779722 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137870520018 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319188803492 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107222334863 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.