Percentage of people using multiple social networking sites
The given diagram Illustrates the percentage use of multiple social networking sites by Canadian citizens in two years, 2014 and 2015.
In one year, there is a small increase in the percentage of people with multiple social networking. However, the percentage of people who are not using any social networking site has not changed much; there is only one percent decrease. In 2014 and 2015, the majority of people use only one social networking site. People who use four of five social networking sites at the same time has increased by a small percentage from 2014 to 2015 but never crossed above 10 percent.
In general, we can observe an enhancement of multiple networking site usage in the bar diagram.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child's development. What gift would you give to help a child to develop? 56
- The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. 67
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? 78
- The table shows social and economic indicators for four different countries in 1994. Summarise the main features. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tworking site usage in the bar diagram.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 595.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 120.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63806273618 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 189.0 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0995255001 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.656926294207 0.215688989381 305% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.361563289255 0.103423049105 350% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861274762243 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409090250863 0.15604864568 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161501742951 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.