The percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions
The line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to the UK who travelled to four various places in Brighton between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that while the percentage of travellers who visited to the Art Gallery and the Festival decreased, the figure for the others increased. Additionally, the proportion visiting to the Pavilion experienced the most dramatic change during the research period.
In 1980, the percentage of people visited the Festival was highest at exactly 30% and then went down slightly to about 25% in 1995. The figure for the Pavilion and the Art Gallery were lower at below 25%, about 21% respectively in 1980. In contrast, only at around 10% of tourists visited the Pier which was the lowest number at the same time. Despite some fluctuations, the figure for visitors who attended the Festival rose slightly by around 2% at the end of the period.
By 2010, there was a gradual decrease in the proportion of tourists to the Pavilion to around 30% after reaching a peak of about 45% in 1995. In addition, the number for the Art Gallery declined significantly to less than 10%, much lower than that of the Pavilion. Meanwhile, the percentage of visitors seeing Pier ACCOUNTED FOR over 20%, was much higher, compared with that of Art gallery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-22 | corincic1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | Bhimani Nikunj | 11 | view |
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- task 1 never married 84
- task 1: member of parliament 78
- task 1: the expenditure on Beef, Lamb 78
- Task 2 In many countries the quality of life of people in large cities are becoming worse What is the reason And measures could be taken to solve this problem 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...re for the Pavilion and the Art Gallery were lower at below 25%, about 21% respectiv...
^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase in the proportion of tourists to the Pavilion to around 30% after reaching a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88532110092 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6669844696 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.9318451639 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17739531315 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708366973643 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509135449718 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11301967337 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04143002848 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.