The line graph illustrates the percentage of English tourists who visited Brighton attractions (Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier, Festival). The numbers are measured in percents.
Overall, the pick of the graph belong to tourists who visited Pavilion in 1995, the percentage is approximately 48. The lowest point represent visitors of the Art Gallery in 2010 (less than 10%). In the middle of the chart is Brighton Festival, 30% of English tourists prefer to visit this attraction in 1980, and circa 28% in next 30 years.
The most popular attraction in Brighton in 1980 is Festival, and it keeps its popularity during 30 years, having just little changes in percentage. For example in 1995 it is 25% and in 2000 it is 27 %.
Comparing the Festival and Pavilion, which is more popular in 1995, the Pavilion's line is more fluctuated. In 1980 it had 22%, after 10 years the popularity increased to 40%, but after 1995, it started to decrease till 2010 year and represented 31 %.
The year 1980, was the worst for Pier attraction, compared with Festival it had just 10 % of visitors. During 30 years it had some changes, but not so considerably. In 2000 it had a little bit more than 20% of visitors. Also, not so popular is Art Gallery, it had a widening during just 5 years (1980-1985) and achieved the lowest point in 2010.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have a part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 56
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have a part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sent visitors of the Art Gallery in 2010 less than 10%. In the middle of the char...
^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...t not so considerably. In 2000 it had a little bit more than 20% of visitors. Also, not so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77192982456 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69786939612 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4826192463 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6923076923 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213866795538 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797870646032 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137526200656 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159305479179 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165008530452 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.