The provided bar chart illustrates the periodic consumption of the nutrition consisting of greens in the UK between 2002 and 2010 by both genders along with younger generation, children.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the female population in the UK took the lead in each provided year, whereas children, were significantly lower in the devouring of fruits and vegetables. With regards to women of the United Kingdom, the graph depicts that the feminine side of the population was the most tremendous consumers of healthy diet, hence over 25% of females preferred adding such ingredients to their everyday eating habit. It is also worth mentioning that in a span of 4 years, the popularity of fruits and vegetables sharply increased to 32% making it the highest percentage during the graph.
UK's men had approximately the same number compared to females. More than 22% of men introduced a healthy habit to their routine. In 2006, the male population had a boost as well, reaching its high on 26% of people. By contrast, the lowest percentages tend to be in the younger generation, as only about 11% out of 35% in 2002, devoured greens on an everyday basis. However, this category also had a gradual rise to 18% that was followed by a decline to 16%.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative development 89
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87441860465 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78476112756 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641860465116 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4186202514 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102205305281 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373731461119 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304984315136 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654002857343 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014094909601 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.