The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025

The maps describe the changes occurring to a center between 2010 and 2025.
It is apparent that the center will experience relatively comprehensive modernization with the modification of some old places and the construction of multiple new rooms. However, there are a number of areas that are going to remain unchanged.
In 2010, the center had a simple design with seven areas, including two rooms, a reception area, a hall, a car park and two gardens. The rooms, located in the top left-hand corner of the center, were immediately next to the hall and the reception. The reception was directly connected to one of the gardens, while the other garden was to the east of the L-shaped car park.
In 2025, the rooms in the northwestern corner will undergo no change, but the hall and the reception will be enlarged due to the relocation of the car park and the demolition of the eastern garden. As a result, a new residence hall with a capacity of 20 rooms will also be erected, standing next to the old hall. The car park will be moved south-eastwards and shrink, while the old garden right beside it will grow in width. To the front of this garden, a variety of new facilities will be built, namely an IT center, a canteen and kitchen, two meeting rooms, a game room and a music room.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 504, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...of new facilities will be built, namely an IT center, a canteen and kitchen, two meet...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 510, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
... facilities will be built, namely an IT center, a canteen and kitchen, two meeting roo...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, as to, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69318259949 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526086956522 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.33902439024 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1832423977 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0386240205002 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211803568376 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408708649187 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0428866203183 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538128592908 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.