the picture show how tomatos ketchup made.
The given picture reveals the information about how tomatos ketchup is make. It is a clear and coherent representation.
Firstly, the tomatos pick the plants and put into the basket. Next step is short goods and the bad tomatos diffuse on the table. Thirth step has the tomatos send the factories and the tomatos skin stafk and seeds removed. The tomatos put into the container.
Secondly, the tomatos Crush in container and after crush the tomatos add the sugar vingar and salt in tomato juice. Furthermore after that container put on the fire for bolling the juice of the tomatos and leave the two hours after 2 hours the ketchup filled in the bottles. Moreover, next step is paste the label on the bottles and next step is that the quality control check the quality of the kitchup. The bottles packed into the box and Delivered the supermarket for sale. The buy the ketchupand eat with hamburger and fries.
- the only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The two maps shows the development in stokeford from 1930 to 2018 67
- the world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population. 78
- library should provide more books rather than new tecnology such as computer and e-books. What extend do you agree or disagree. 56
- The diagrams below show how glass containers such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... representation. Firstly, the tomatos pick the plants and put into the basket....
^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... sugar vingar and salt in tomato juice. Furthermore after that container put on the fire fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36681967425 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522012578616 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5495248751 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.0 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259265606632 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959807603523 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106347238048 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202779958762 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08369882406 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.