The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram gives information about how garments were manufactured from recycled plastic bottles.
It is clear that there are various stages to have a complete clothing. Starting with preparing plastic bottles and are finished with a real product of clothes.
In the first step, there is a host of plastic bottles collected with different sizes from small to big. After that, these plastic bottles are sent to the factories by truck to sort, this was followed by cutting. These plastic bottles are cut into smaller pieces and then washed carefully to dry within 10 hours. Afterward, The total of plastic bottles are boiled to a certain temperature to be ready for the next stages of producing.

Additionally, To go on manufacturing, The melted substance are strained into yarn with different colors and then to be weaved to roll up into separated units. The process ends when recycled plastic bottles are produced into clothes .

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2023-11-29 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-08-28 Daniel3003 84 view
2023-08-27 alohahahihi view
2023-08-25 Duc2711@ view
Essays by user chau ha :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lastic bottles are produced into clothes .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65551866675 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640522875817 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8571225851 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180012554479 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806286400446 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659401843325 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106628650253 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339646442261 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.