The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The map shows how Shipsmouth was developed over a 15-years period.
Overall, there had been constructions in the Shipsmouth in terms of skyscrapers and pedestrian area in the city center.
Regarding the first years, in the western east side of Shipsmouth there were church, but during the next 15 years this place is changed to be a pub. Another striking change is that the was not any apartment blocks for the residents.A factory which is a concern of pollutant because of its smoke was concerned and replaced by modern shopping center.
The main changes in the city center was pedestrianized in 2010, which meant that there were some ways for only people who walk. Another interesting development is that there were many trees in 1995 in the eastern south of the city, which was cut down and by 2010, an airport had been constructed in their places.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... any apartment blocks for the residents.A factory which is a concern of pollutant...
^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is that there were many trees in 1995 in the eastern south of the city, which was...
^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he city, which was cut down and by 2010, an airport had been constructed in their...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, regarding, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81632653061 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64136616467 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639455782313 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2395624853 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104291891433 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529892990705 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233097185948 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588352263298 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243255639561 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.