the pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisions.
Illustrated in the diagrams is the breakdown of the sales of buying each retail facet on the internet, namely travel, film/music, books and clothes in New Zealand during 10 years, starting from 2003.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the online shopping sales of travel and clothes sectors underwent a sustainable increase whilst those of 2 remaining factors had a slight decrease.
In 2003, the online deals of traveling and clothing sectors accounted for over one-third and 24 percent respectively. These figures suddenly dropped to 29 percent and 16 percent for each previous sector by the time of 2013.
Conversely, there was a dramatic rise in the online buying sales of entertainment, in particular, film, music, and books sectors in the period of 10 years. The sales of film and music surged from about a quarter in 2003 to one-third in 2013 as well as those of books. The revenue of books showed a hike of 22% in 2013 from 19% in the past 10 the years.
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 78
- some people think that some children do not have the natural ability to study other languages so schools should not force them to study foreign languages Agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- the pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, look, third, well, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85964912281 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69981703152 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7004443331 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207353747457 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970757474704 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196669997779 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120809393272 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150264710457 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.