The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The figures above reveal some changes on electricity production by different source in two periods 1980 and then in 2000.
By the year 1980, in Australia the whole amount of production experienced an considerable increase from 100 units accede to 170 units. On the closer examination, the level of production for hydro power and coal soared from 20 and 50 to 36 and 130 respectively. However, on the contrary, these changes had not impact on natural gas and oil also on the reverse made them the least fuel production.
For France, apart from mentioned units nuclear power had added to the varieties of fuel sources. In 1980 and 2000. By the given statics, total production exactly doubled. Not included the coal which for the both years was the same degree, for the rest sorts these changes were diverse. In the 2000, nuclear power had the highest rank of production, whereas in 1980 natural gas and oil together had the most production level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- A Neuroscientist Reveals How to Think Differently 56
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 56
- Do good exam results at school or college guarantee success in life? Discuss. Do you believe that studying hard will bring a better life 84
- This bar chart shows the percentage of Australian graduates on full-time employment four months after graduation, between 1995 and 2001 89
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... whole amount of production experienced an considerable increase from 100 units ac...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'impacted'.
Suggestion: impacted
... on the contrary, these changes had not impact on natural gas and oil also on the reve...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, apart from, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56496894547 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1855352501 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8888888889 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233887975319 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11211182175 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915510303507 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172098877759 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411087636358 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.