The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The presented pie charts depict information about how much electricity was produced in Australia and France by various types of fuel sources classified into coal, oil, natural gas, hydro power and nuclear power over two separate years.
At first glance, it is very clear that coal was the main source for electricity production in Australia, whilst France used the nuclear power more in recent years to produce their electricity demand.
When observing the data in more detail, Australia produced 100 units of electricity in 1980 and 170 units in 2000 while the production in France was 90 units and doubled in the year 2000. Coal burning in terms of the provide electricity in Australia accounted for the most significant proportion 1980; it was one half of the total production and almost tripled in 2000. In comparison to proportions of natural gas and oil to make an energy in 1980, which comprised 20 and 10 units of total generating, respectively, but their share dipped substantially by 18 and 8 over the course of these 20 years.
With regarding electricity generation of France, the share of nuclear power was initially as low as that of natural gas (15 units), but while the former considerably surged almost eight-fold, the latter experienced a marked drop reaching 2 units. The contribution of hydro power had fallen minimally from 5 to 3 units in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada. 11
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 84
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu company in euros between January 2006 and December 2010. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the year 2000. Coal burning in terms of the provide electricity in Australia accounted for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03493449782 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81470096509 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589519650655 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.922626895 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.714285714 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353975881153 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16078857603 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101497143703 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194927658777 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823873334352 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.