The pie chart below shows the frequency of U.S. Adults’ online purchasing habits in 2015, while the bar chart shows a further classification denoting online purchasing preferences.
Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrate the propotion maturity customer’s shopping tendency in the Internet of US in 2015, while the bar chart demonstrates how many online stores and physical stores were enrolled by different types of US buyer.
Overall, it is clear to seen that less often of online shopper was represend in the highest percentage. Besides, while the buying in physical store out of numbers buying online in the most often type’s shopper, the opposite was true for monthly online shoppers.
In particular, people who spend less time on shopping online registered the highest percentage at 37% . At 28%, the propotion of buying online few time a month ranked second in the pie chart. In 2015, the customers who never purchasing in the website account for 20% while the opposite favour of shopping comprised the smallest propotion at 15%.
As for the bar chart, less frequent online shoppers occurred the most popular among buying in physical store at 82%, which over 4 times the figure for online ones at near 20%. The similar pattern could also odserved in all online shoppers, as the propotion of physical store was nearly twice as many as that of online at 65% comparied to 35%. Weeky online is opposite which people chose online at over 62% more than physical store at nearly 40%
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-01 | Raspreet s. | 78 | view |
2023-02-01 | Harman97 | 78 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the frequency of U S Adults online purchasing habits in 2015 while the bar chart shows a further classification denoting online purchasing preferences Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 69
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 61
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ine registered the highest percentage at 37% . At 28%, the propotion of buying o...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...egistered the highest percentage at 37% . At 28%, the propotion of buying online...
^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... At 28%, the propotion of buying online few time a month ranked second in the pie chart....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, second, so, while, as for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90867579909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46064477877 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538812785388 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3056165099 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195297987436 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966037239351 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378235978796 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133685413912 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275490690762 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.