The pie chart below shows the household spending pattern in the two countries between 1980 and 2008.
The charts compare five categories of household expenditure in the UK and New Zealand in the year 1980 and 2008.
In 1980, 29% of new Zealand's household budget went on food and drink, while the equivalent figure for the UK was 23%. By contrast, both countries experienced a slight increase in expenditure on utility bills for the average home, from 27% to 31% in New Zealand and from 26% to 28% in the uk.
Further scrutinizing the chart, In both years, the expenditure on leisure remained higher for the UK as against France. Both countries experienced a slight decline in expenditure on transport for the average home from 17% to 16% in New Zealand and from 15% to 14% in the UK. In both years, the expenditure on other remained similar for the UK and New Zealand.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of expenditure on food and drink dropped significantly in both countries over the period shown whereas expenditure on utility bills increased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Veena rani | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | Komalsandhu | 40 | view |
| 2017-02-27 | danthoai711 | 73 | view |
| 2017-02-27 | danthoai711 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...aland and from 26% to 28% in the uk. Further scrutinizing the chart, In both years, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83636363636 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81210815044 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50303030303 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4188019913 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956115853181 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601638149736 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617168632259 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851047624142 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689748322642 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.