The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.
The given circular chart demonstrates the information about, how the fertile land loss its dignity by four main reasons, and the tabular chart just beneath it, highlights that how much land is degraded in the three regions by the four causes; mentioned in circular chart during the period of 1990. The data is calibrated in per centum
As is observed from the given illustration, Universal land is degraded by four major causes: over cultivation, overgrazing, deforestation and other, whereas the regions affected by these causes: North America, Europe and Oceania are mentioned in second layout; tabular chart.
It can be clearly seen that, more than a third of the total land is degraded by overgrazing.In addition to this, the second cause of degradation of global land is deforestation; which spoils less than a third of the total land whereas, the another cause of Degradation is over cultivation, which comprises 28% agricultural land into less productive comma and 7% land is degraded due to other causes.
Secondly, as mentioned in tabular chart, 5% land was degraded in North America because this Nation involve; 0.2% deforestation, 3.3% over cultivation and 1.5% overgrazing. Surprisingly, in Europe, land had being degraded by highest percentage; 33% due to 9.8% deforestation, 7.7% over cultivation, 5.5% overgrazing. Lastly, in Oceania there had been deforestation, over cultivation, overgrazing by the percentage of 1.7%, 0%, 11.3% respectively which results in total 13% degradation.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silk worm and stages in the production of silk cloth 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 78
- The three Pie Charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981, 1991 and 2001 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l land is degraded by four major causes: over cultivation, overgrazing, deforesta...
^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e total land is degraded by overgrazing.In addition to this, the second cause of d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15675172484 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.1399667162 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.333333333 112.824112599 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178424516033 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839340462457 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687884542505 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114696036462 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576849592965 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 13.2329268293 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.