The provided circular chart illustrates the contributing factors of less productive agricultural land globaly while the table reveals the percentage of reasons leading to land degradation in three areas notably North America, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s. In general, it is clear that over-grazing impacted the productivity of agricultural land the most. However, the most cause of land degradation were vary in each regions.
As presented in the pie chart, over-grazing caused 35% of land degradation followed by deforestation which was 5% lower. Moreover, the over-cultivation also made 28% of the agricultural land worldwide less productivity.
However, looking in more detail from the table, although Europe showed the highest degradation among other regions, the degradation of land in each of areas compared caused by different factors. In North America, over-cultivation made over half of its land less productive while in Europe deforestation was reported as the main factor at 9.8%. In Oceania on the other hand, overgrazing impacted 11.3% of 13% of its land to become degraded.
- Nowadays all new town planning should include public parks shopping malls and sports facilities Do you agree or disagree 73
- Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...ably North America, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s. In general, it is clear that over-graz...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ver, the most cause of land degradation were vary in each regions. As presented i...
^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
...the most cause of land degradation were vary in each regions. As presented in the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, in fact, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58682634731 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22752824588 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9634420637 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287989041627 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128905923049 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495593815939 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202909135503 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474834055936 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.