The pie chart illustrates the percentage of overgrazing, cultivation, deforestation and other reasons leading to minimal production of farmland. Likewise, the table describes the proportion of land degradation in North America, Europe, and Oceania in 1990.
Overall, overgrazing leads to a major influence on land degradation and Europe was in the highest position among the two other countries.
First of all, in a pie chart, the overwhelming majority of land degradation is caused by overgrazing with 35%. Similarly, over-cultivation and deforestation account for about 30% and 28% respectively. Other reasons behind the problem stand for a mere 7%.
On other hand, the given table explains 23% of total degradation takes place in Europe mainly by deforestation (9.8%) over-cultivation (7.7%) and overgrazing (5.5%). Oceania takes the second position with 13% in which overgrazing was the main factor with 11.3%. Oceania was the only country with zero per cent over-cultivation in given regions when North America has 3.3%. Whereas, 1.7% deforestation causes Oceania degradation which is higher than North America with 0.2%. North America, was the lowest land degraded region with 5% and overgrazing includes 1.5%.
- In many developing countries there is a problem with declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this. 78
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 73
- animals are in danger extinction some people said that we should protect those animals which are useful to humans to what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today's society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and deforestation account for about 30% and 28% respectively. Other reasons behi...
^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en regions when North America has 3.3%. Whereas, 1.7% deforestation causes Oceania degr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, second, similarly, so, whereas, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64130434783 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24306734779 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1051743714 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112730202509 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508313238068 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337752708294 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746712141792 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343753919131 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.