The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned pie chart demonstrates the significant basis of farming land being unfertile. Likewise, table illustrates the major three regions namely North America, Europe and Oceania of the world in 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that land was degraded globally due to overgrazing as well as over- cultivation. Similarly, Europe was the most affected region whereas the North America had the lowest proportion of unfertile land.
It is evident that over- grazing was the significant reason behind the distortion worldwide and Oceania with figure of 35% and 11.3% respectively. In contrast, other intention accounted the ratio of 7% around the globe while in North America overgrazing had sharply low rate of only 5%.
However, deforestation and over-cultivation had considerably higher percentage in the world 28% and 30 % respectively but the former accounted only 0.2% in North America and latter contributed 0% in Oceania. Moreover, land was destroyed considerably because of tree clearance 9.8% followed by over-cultivation 7.7% and overgrazing 11.3% in Europe. In addition, cultivable land had reduces production due to deforestation (1.7%) in Oceania whereas in North America over-cultivation degraded the agricultural land by 3.3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...merica, Europe and Oceania of the world in 1990s. Overall, it is clear that land was ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71505376344 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28252526543 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9393067579 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103310329606 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511526172703 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041795516584 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759608571332 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057186947108 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.