The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The two pie charts illustrate how different energy sectors in France producted the energy production of France percentage wise in the year 1995 and 2005.
The percentage of energy production in France in the year 1995 was coal, it got 29,80% it was also the highest proportion of all categories of energy. And followed by gas as the second popular energy production and it got 29,63%. Both of coal energy and gas energy was the kinds of energy which minimally increase in 2005. The use of coal energy growth to 30,93% while the use of gas energy was also increased to 30,31%.
There were also kinds of energy of nuclear and other changed significantly from 1995 until 2005. Other was the kinds of energy which climbed from 4,90% to 9,10%, and the percentage of nuclear energy also rose rapidly by 3,7%, from 6,40% increased to 10,10% while the petro energy was the only one of categories of energy that dramatically fallen from 29,27% reduced to 19,55% during ten-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd other changed significantly from 1995 until 2005. Other was the kinds of energ...
^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...005. Other was the kinds of energy which climbed from 4,90% to 9,10%, and the pe...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r was the kinds of energy which climbed from 4,90% to 9,10%, and the percentage ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79289940828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41298263713 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467455621302 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7023565853 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312381630197 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172627355157 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136040198888 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274311308863 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158968505967 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.