The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart and the table illustrate the percentage of degraded land globally and their causes by region in 1990s. Overall it is evident that, by region, Europe ranked topped in terms of total land degradation while North America witnessed least percentage of land degradation. There is no substantial difference in percentage between the three main causes namely deforestation, over-cultivation and overgrazing of land degradation worldwide.
Over-cultivation and overgrazing, these two human acts account for around two third of total land degradation globally, while another less than one third land 30 % was degraded by deforestation. Others cause account of 7 % of land loss worldwide.
In Europe, deforestation attributed around one tenth of total land degradation, however it had minimal impact on degradation in North America and Oceania region. Deforestation only account for 0.2% and 1.7% land loss in North America and Oceania region respectively. Surprisingly, over-cultivation was the 2nd major of land loss in Europe, while it caused roughly two third of total land degradation in North America.
In Oceania region over three fourth lands was loss by overgrazing, however over-cultivation had no impact on land loss in Oceania region. Overgrazing was 2nd most important cause of land degradation in North America and it caused 5.5% land loss in Europe.
- Most of the schools are planning to replace sports and exercise classes with more academic sessions. What i s your opinion on this change? How is this change will affect children’s life in your view? 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...and globally and their causes by region in 1990s. Overall it is evident that, by region,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5619047619 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30688301246 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2810658159 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155029513831 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887930894346 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486822882155 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113839520684 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439598273162 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.