The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.
The presented circular layout depicts the information about the land degradation by four primary geneses in the world whereas the tabular representation showcases the total proportion of land degraded in the three nations during the time period of 1990. Collaboration of data was done in per centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that amongst the four causes, overgrazing was the highest significant part while the least contribution presented by overcultivation. However, Europe was the most adversely affected area.
At first glance it is clear that, overgrazing is the major culprit with 35%share in land degradation. The following deforestation which claimed at 30% , and overcultivation had least share comprises of 28%.
It can be dogged that, the most affected nation was Eroupe which accounted for 23% whereas the 5% of total land degraded had shown by the North America.Deforestation had been the main reason which destoyed 9.8% land.Oceania was the significant affected area with 11.3% by overgrazing.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the during the 1990. 61
- It is said that adulterated food is a key reason behind deteriorated health of all age group masses To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Coin and paper money will soon be replaced by credit and debit card Eventually we will have cashless society which will be safer and more convenient to everyone 92
- The diagrams show the stages amd equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 78
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...owing deforestation which claimed at 30% , and overcultivation had least share com...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...ch claimed at 30% , and overcultivation had least share comprises of 28%. It can be do...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...% , and overcultivation had least share comprises of 28%. It can be dogged that, the most...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Deforestation
...degraded had shown by the North America.Deforestation had been the main reason which destoyed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Oceania
...he main reason which destoyed 9.8% land.Oceania was the significant affected area with...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed 9.8% land.Oceania was the significant affected area with 11.3% by overgrazing....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60248447205 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39207500499 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627329192547 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.458941747 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110552124654 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364985874607 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461410813309 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614842207275 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415325226605 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.