The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the during the 1990.
The circular layout illustrates the four major causes of worldwide land degradation, and the tabular representation showcases the affected three countries by land degradation in the given time period 1990.Units are measured in percentile.
Overall, it is evident that overgrazing represented the largest portion whereas was undoubtedly the smallest. Europe was the only nation which was mostly affected by land degradation except other two countries.
At first glance it is clear that the overgrazing had the major culprit of less productivity of land which was accounted for 35%. Overcultivation and deforestation were the two consequences, they both comprised of minor difference in percentile which were both claimed at 28% and 30% respectively.
According the per centum the land degradation, the most affected country was Eroupe by total land degradated that denoted at 23%.The least significant percentage had in North Africa were 0.2% and 1.5% by the two causes: deforestation and overgrazing respectively.
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 78
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in Euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the during the 1990. 61
- The table shows the proportion s of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...gradation in the given time period 1990.Units are measured in percentile. Overall,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is clear that the overgrazing had the major culprit of less productivity of la...
^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the per centum the land degradation, the most affected country was Eroupe by ...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tal land degradated that denoted at 23%.The least significant percentage had in No...
^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....The least significant percentage had in North Africa were 0.2% and 1.5% by the t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74342105263 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29325440628 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1611695057 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102540062358 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512699938202 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467426075932 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676052629713 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426032390326 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.