The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land changes less productive and the table expresses these causes impacted three areas of the world during the 1990s.
It is explicit that over-grazing and deforestation were estimated as the main to cause worldwide land degradation. Beside, the highest proportion belonged to Europe as the most degraded region.
To begin with the pie chart first, there was two the biggest reasons almost resemble percentages: over-grazing approximately 35% and deforestation achieved less with 30%. Furthermore, 7% worldwide was in risk with other reason and this was also the least proportion of causes.
On the other hand, all the data showed on the table that Europe was the region where had total land degraded seriously almost 23%. Remarkably the highest performances also appeared in Europe’s over-cultivation around 7.7%. On the contrary, Oceania succeeded with 0% for over-cultivation of degraded land. Particularly, North America reached the smallest percentages in deforestation with 0.2% and also resulted in 5% total land degraded, this was the best data from the table.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 89
- fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 73
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this was the best data from the table.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, so, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50857142857 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13278385687 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0824906271 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.111111111 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295774032905 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12138358142 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186596599431 0.0843802449381 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2264599802 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.236136811567 0.0819641961636 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.