The pie chart below illustrates the portion of people from each household type living in poverty in the UK in 2002
As you can seen, sole parents in the United Kingdom in 2002 was the highest ratio poor British family types, with 26%. Following sole parent, the proportion of single without children was the second largest in the UK and it accounted for 24% The fraction of both kind of household made up half of the total poverty families in the UK in 2002
According to the pie chart, couple with children had the same percentage of British family as all households with 15% and 14% respectively. While it is only 9% couple without children in the UK in 2002, the latter was the smallest proportion of those family and that was aged couple with only 5%
To sum up, it is clear that people in the UK like live alone and some of them like having a family with children
- The chart below show the number of working hoirs per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 67
- The chart below show the number of working hoirs per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 61
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below illustrates the portion of people...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...n poverty in the UK in 2002 As you can seen, sole parents in the United Kingdom in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this family' or 'those families'?
Suggestion: this family; those families
...e latter was the smallest proportion of those family and that was aged couple with only 5% ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 713.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31641214158 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 22.4926829268 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4691553899 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 237.666666667 112.824112599 211% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.6666666667 22.9334400587 234% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214637039556 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160250541608 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339909824144 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146229829149 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641300238549 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.3 13.2329268293 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 10.3012195122 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.4329268293 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.9970731707 211% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.