PIE CHART ON DIFFERENT EXPENDITURES ON MOVIE
The given pie chart portrays the allocation of different expenditures in the production of a movie.
Overall, It is witnessed that varied costs are shelled out in producing a movie. To be more precise, the actors' salaries draw out the highest proportion whereas the funds spend on logistics constitutes the lowest proportion.
Analysing each expense profoundly, the percentage of actors' salaries account for 36% which is the largest of all expenses. However, the percentage of equipment comprises less than half of the actors' salaries. Moving towards the other portion of expenditures, the percentage of marketing stands at one-fifth of the entire budget, while the percentage of the film crew adds up to 12% which is half of the marketing.
Nevertheless, there are some other segments of expenses too that are drawn in a film-making process. The director's fee and the writer's fee, both combined accounts for 10% of the whole budget. Conversely, the percentage of logistics amounts to 4% which is at the lowest of all outlays.
- expenditure on a movie-making process. 84
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 61
- Number of men and women in different evening courses 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20359281437 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95383825853 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2223880593 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895536837915 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488083322574 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13805081087 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109818747579 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190211650431 0.0819641961636 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.