The pie charts give the amount of electricity gotten from renewables and other sources in both Germany and France in the year 2009. Generally, conventional thermal generated more electricity in Germany than all other sources including renewables, while nuclear gave out the most electricity in France in. The renewables are wind, hydroelectric, solar biomass and geothermal. However, biomass generated more electricity as a renewable in Germany than the others, while hydroelectric generated more in France.
In Germany, conventional thermal was the source of choice in generating electricity with a proportion of 59.6%. Nuclear came second in its contribution to national electricity, providing 23.0% percent. In contrast, nuclear generated more electricity in France than all sources, edging conventional thermal by 65.7%. In both Germany and France, renewables where not significant sources of electricity, contributing 17.4% and 13.7% to the national electricity respectively.
Although renewables are made up five sources; hydroelectric, wind, biomass solar and geothermal, all but geothermal contributed to the generation of electricity in both countries. Solar generated the lowest electricity in both Germany and France with proportions of 6.1% and 0.9%. Biomass generated 39.3% of electricity in Germany, the most generated by any renewable. It was closely followed by wind that contributed 36.9%. Hydroelectric was a distant third in its generation of electricity in Germany, contributing 17.3%. Nonetheless, it generated the most electricity in France by a massive 80.5% . Wind contributed 10.5% while biomass ironically generated 8.1% of electricity.
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a b nd c over four different seasons summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tones from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...electricity in France by a massive 80.5% . Wind contributed 10.5% while biomass ir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35654128244 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470833333333 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1450165614 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269724407005 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11149249577 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823269421584 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208993259745 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632855703167 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.