The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The pie charts depict income and expenditure in a year by an American charity organization for children. Overall, the children's charity had exactly six sources of funds and among them, the ultimate source was food donation whereas they spent their money in three sectors and program services cost them the highest percentage of money.
While the charity largely spent money on the program service and it was precisely 95.8%, they vastly got their funds as donated food and it bought 86.6% of their yearly earnings. The second large income source was the community contribution, which was one-tenth; however, the second maximum cost was for the fundraising and it was 2.6% of total cost.
Moreover, there were four other sources of revenue for this organization - program revenue (2.2%), investment income (0.2%), government grants (0.2%), and other income(0.4%). On the other hand, management and general cost accounted 1.6% of total budget and it was the lowest expenditure made by the charity. Furthermore, the total receiving fund was $53, 561,580 in a year and the total cost was $53,224,896 which shows just over 330,000 saving for the charity in this year.
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 78
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and go into regional areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people believe that to become the vegetarian is the only way to keep healthy. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 65
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14893617021 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54255789611 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0492859903 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185895822128 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943311488098 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836435258659 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136628160386 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713811286862 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.