The pie chart shows the expenditure for Candian households in 1992 and 2002.
The pie chart depicts the percentage of money spent on Canadian households such as food, cars, restaurants, and so on in two different years 1972 and 2002.
At the onset, it is clear that in the past, people spent plenty of money on buying food, while at present, people are spending money on purchasing cars. Besides, buying computers has become a trend these days, but people spend money on books, furniture, petrol, et Cetra.
Now, turning into the details, in 1972, the portion of the money spent on food which accounts for 39%, was significantly higher than the proportion of money spent on cars which makes up only 22%. In 2002, the reverse is the case on the expenditure on cars which amounts to 40% and on food is 14%. Besides, the expenditure on books was 7% in 1972 which fell by 4% in 2002. Moreover, in 1972 which fell by 4% in 2002. Moreover, in 1972, the percentage of money spend on petrol was precisely the as the percentage of money spend on petrol in 2002.
In the case of the computer, the expenditure on this increased by 8% in 2002 from 1972 and slightly plunged by 2% from 1972 to 2002 in buying furniture. In 2002, the expenditure on restaurants almost doubled from previous year.
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services 79
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pie chart shows the expenditure for Candian households in 1992 and 2002. 67
- The graph below shows the rate of attendance for primary and secondary schools for boys and girls across the world 66
- The graph shows the number of trips which was done by children in one country in 1990 and in 2010 travel to and from by using various types of transports. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...over, in 1972 which fell by 4% in 2002. Moreover, in 1972, the percentage of money spend...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57603686636 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5254381227 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493087557604 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1801991847 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171255336801 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855806227668 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620612235844 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115039533136 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719720513189 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.