The chart compares fish bought from US to other countries, with the table giving the breakdown of the costs for the years; 1988, 1992 and 2000.
Overall, it is clearly evident that supplies of fish from United States to Canada dropped notably, whereas China increased its importation over the time period. For the sum of value spent in the years shown, there was a considerable rise.
With regards to the total expenditure over the time frame, in 1988, a total of 6.57 billion dollars was recorded. However, after the 12 year period, the figure had shot up by roughly 4 billion dollars, being higher than the previous years.
In terms of importing fish from US, in 1988 Canadians were by far the most predominant with a proportion of 60%, while China and other nations accounted for 40%. After 4 years, fish received by China and other countries went up to 20% and nearly a half respectively, but, Canada experienced a massive decline to around a third. In the year end, the rate of China's imports had increased to 30%, with both Canada and other countries going down slightly.
- Modern technology allows machines to perform the hard work instead of humans Does this have a positive or a negative effect on people Give your own opinion and examples 81
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 78
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 89
- With the rise of ebooks comes the decline in paper books. Some people see this as a good forward step while others do not. What are advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 61
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78191489362 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46254766736 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622340425532 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1422169525 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202241359716 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856974919047 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813500795187 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130658843376 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830210850984 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.